The Leaven Table
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact


​

PERFECTING THE MAN CHRIST JESUS – A GLIMPSE INTO THE MYSTERY OF SUFFERING

26/4/2022

5 Comments

 
ingYeshua[1] Immanuel[2] is the Man Christ Jesus,[3] a man like us[4]. He is God Incarnate[5], God become human,[6] as human as you and I[7].
 
According to the scriptures, this human, grew and developed from his becoming conception[8] to a babe,[9] a child[10] and increased in wisdom and stature in favour with God and man[11]. Little is known of his growing up years into manhood except this and that he had worked as a carpenter[12].
 
Most of what is recorded in the Scriptures is of him as a grown man onwards, from his baptism by his cousin John[13], his ministry, his death, resurrection and ascension.
 
However, concerning the purpose of his becoming human, there are many passages recorded in Scripture that address this.
 
For the purposes of this post, I would like to address the virtues of obedience and suffering in perfecting Jesus as a human, found in the Gospels, letters of Paul and letter to the Hebrews. And in the process, hopefully, shed a little light and understanding of the mystery of suffering and futility in the life of Christ and its application, if relevant, to our lives
 
I wish to begin by referencing some passages in Luke 13.
 
When warned by certain Pharisees that Herod wanted to kill him, Jesus answered: “Go ye and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and will heal still today, and tomorrow, and the third day I shall be perfected. In any case, I must press on today and tomorrow and the next day—for surely no prophet can die outside Jerusalem!”[14]
 
The third day in Jesus’ answer may be interpreted literally to mean that he would continue to do what he was doing until the third day from his answer, or/as well as figuratively to refer to the third day when he is to rise from his death.
 
In the first literal interpretation, it would only mean that he had the intention to only cast out devils and heal until the third day from his answer.
 
In the figurative interpretation, it would mean that he would continue to be who he is and do what he had come to do and be perfected as a human and complete all that he had to do on his resurrection from the dead, on the third day from his death. I tend to prefer and favour this interpretation in light of the many references that he made concerning his resurrection on the third day.[15] For, as Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 15:17 “if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile, you are still in your sins!”[16]
 
Therefore it would seem that the resurrection of Christ is imperative not only for the human Christ Jesus to be perfected, but also is the expression of the evidential reality that the problematic issue of sin between God and man has finally found its complete solution in the man Christ Jesus.
 
Many have assumed that the human, God had become, was perfect, complete and whole in all ways and at all times.
 
There are, however, Scripture references that state or suggest that this is not the case. The passage in Luke 13:33-34 is just one of them.
 
The writer of Hebrews in Hebrews 2:10 wrote: “In bringing many sons and daughters to glory, it was fitting that God, for whom and through whom everything exists, should make the pioneer of their salvation perfect through what he suffered.”[17]
 
Note that it was God, perfecting the man, Jesus, the pioneer of our salvation, through what he suffered. The suffering that Christ Jesus had to go through was to enable him to identify with us in all ways, that he might be our merciful High Priest, to be the mercy and atonement for our sins.[18] For “Although he was a Son, he learned obedience through what he suffered; and having been made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him, having been designated by God a high priest according to the order of Melchizedek.”[19]
 
The man Christ Jesus could only be perfected or made whole and complete through obedience and suffering. Paul also alludes to this when he wrote: “And being found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.”[20]
 
Only then, did God, therefore “also highly exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”[21] And this happened according to Jesus, only after his resurrection day, after he had been made perfect as a man.[22]
 
For Jesus, the man, the challenge in embracing suffering and learning obedience in suffering, is essential and intrinsic towards growth into perfection vis a vis his relationship of love and goodwill, in union and communion with God and with us, humanity.
 
This is the way of his cross, unique to and for him.
Therefore, he had to become like his brothers and sisters ‘in all things’[23] so that he could be merciful. He became like them, fully ‘human in every way’[24], so that he could serve as a faithful chief priest in God’s presence and make peace with God for their sins[25].
 
Is it any wonder that in the prophecy of Isaiah it is written of him, the Messiah, that he would be “a man of sorrows, and knowing sickness.”[26] “Surely he has borne our sickness and carried our suffering; yet we considered him plagued, struck by God, and afflicted.”[27] “For it pleased Yahweh to bruise him. He has caused him to suffer[28]( sick, make weak, to become helpless in suffering).”
 
All of these, he became and assumed, even feeling and falling into darkest depth in the void of Godforsakeness. In so doing, he proved and embraced his identity, identification, jointness and oneness with us in all of our humanness, in all things.
 
Such is the mystery and sacred expression of Father, Son and Spirit’s joint and several Triune love for us, in the man Christ Jesus, in whom the fullness of Deity dwells bodily.[29]
 
Lest we forget, Father, Son and Spirit are ever one yet three. Though it was the Son who became human, God Incarnate, the joint and several participatory actions of all and each need to be recognized and appreciated – Triune God as and in Father initiating, sending, Son mediating, becoming and Spirit generating into happening.
 
As such, I am of the opinion that it would be proper to say that Father and Spirit also jointly share and participate fully in Son’s  suffering and learning obedience though suffering as a man. Triune God, Father, Son and Spirit, through Incarnate Son, the mediator man Christ Jesus, identifies in jointness and oneness with us in all of our humanness, in all things, to enable us to partake of the Divine nature through union and communion.
​
As such we are not alone. We do not need to suffer alone. Jesus, the perfected and exalted man, our High Priest ever suffers with us, jointly in oneness with us, identifying and feeling our suffering, sickness, weakness and helplessness in and with us, in and through Spirit.
 
Let me put on record that I am not advocating that we seek suffering and sickness so that we can be perfected. Jesus himself preferred not to suffer. He prayed at Gethsemane ““Abba!” (that is, “Dear Father!”) “All things are possible for you. Take this cup away from me! Still, not what I want, but what you want.”[30]
 
Jesus knew that Father God can take suffering away if he willed it,  “All things are possible for you”. He did not want to suffer the pain, weakness, helplessness and the void of feeling godforsaken on the cross. Yet for him, his cross was to experience these things, with Father and Spirit. Father and Spirit ever remained jointly one with him, even though as a man he felt alone and abandoned, Godforsakened on the cross. Even when he felt Godforsakened, as a man, he still committed and thrust himself into the hands of Father in the void of Godforsakenness and death, “And Jesus, crying out with a loud voice, said, “Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit!” Having said this, He breathed His last.”[31]
 
I believe, at this juncture, like Paul wrote of Abraham, his ancestor in the flesh, “In hope he believed against hope”, that Father was still with him and will never leave him. On his part, as a work in progress, man being perfected, he refused to abandon a right relationship with Father, even though he felt abandoned by God.

In my view, his cry with a loud voice: ““Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit”, before breathing his last, is a proclamation of this.
 
Jesus the man allowed God to be who He is, and in hope believed in hope that God will be with him in all of his life and suffering.
 
In allowing God to be with him in his suffering, working it into good for him in perfecting him in his humanity, I reiterate Paul’s statement “For this reason, God highly exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”[32]
 
I believe that for us, even as we are joint heirs with him, we should allow him to suffer with us inasmuch as we are invited to suffer with him, that God may work all things into our good even into perfecting us towards our respective full potential as a unique and loved person.
 
Jesus’ life of a perfecting human, in obedience through suffering, opens for us, the Way, for this  becoming, through the sufficiency of his grace, and the perfection of his strength in our weakness, suffering and helplessness.


[1] Matthew 1:25 “ Greek-Ἰησοῦς transliterated as ‘iēsous’ English Jesus, Hebrew יְהוֹשׁוּעַ ‘yᵊhôšûa’ English Jesus

[2] Matthew 1:25, Isaiah 7:14, 8:8

[3] 2 Timothy 2:5

[4] Hebrews 2:14 “Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same nature,”RSV

[5] John1:14, Luke1:35

[6] Colossians 2:9

[7] Hebrews 2:11 “For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified have all one origin. That is why he is not ashamed to call them brethren,” RSV

[8] Luke 1:35, John 1:14

[9] Luke 1:31, Luke 2:21-38

[10] Luke 2:41-52

[11] Luke 2:52

[12] Mark 6:3

[13] Matthew 3:13, Luke 3:21

[14] Luke 13:33,34

[15] See Matthew 16:21, 17:22-23, 20:17-19, 27:63-64, Luke 9:2, 18:33, 24:7, Mark 9:31, 10:34

[16] NKJV

[17] NIV Hebrews 2:10-11

[18] Greek  ἱλάσκεσθαι – to pardon, to appease, purify, to cover, to reconcile, to make right again. See references in Septuagint when translated from the Hebrew root כָּפַר – kapar Strong’s H3722

[19] Hebrews 5:8-10 RSV

[20] Philippians 2:8 RSV

[21] Philippians 2:9-11 RSV

[22] Luke 13:32

[23] RGT

[24] NIV

[25] GW

[26] Isaiah 53:3 WYC

[27] Isaiah 53:4 WEB

[28] Isaiah 53:10 WEB Hebrew – הֶֽחֱלִי ḥālâ to be or become weak, be or become sick, be or become diseased, be or become grieved, be or become sorry

[29] Colossians 2:9

[30] Mark 14:36 CJB

[31] Luke 23:46 AMP

[32] Philippians 2:9-11 KJV
5 Comments
Chris Kang
29/4/2022 13:38:01

PERFECTION OF JESUS
This essay explores an important nexus between the suffering of Jesus and the nature of his perfection. While it offers a refreshing perspective on Jesus’ perfection as only being accomplished after the cross and in His resurrection, I question the assumption that (a) Jesus could only be perfected through his suffering (see paragraph 16, line 1), as if perfection is a unidimensional status occurring on a polarity between perfect and imperfect; and that (b) the humanity of Jesus needs to be perfected, as if this humanness is divorced from his divinity and is to be separately developed in some fashion (see e.g. paragraphs 16-18). More than that, I feel there are several points that warrant deeper reflection. I list them here as:

(1) the distinction between binary logic and paralogic;
(2) the distinction between essence and activity;
(3) the distinction between four pivotal events of Jesus’ human existence, namely his incarnation, sinless human life, death on the cross, and resurrection-ascension.

First, the distinction between binary logic and paralogic. Binary logic is basically the mode of reasoning predicated on the law of the excluded middle. For example, A and not-A cannot be simultaneously true: where A is true, not-A cannot be true, and where not-A is true, A must be false. Paralogic is, in contrast, a mode of reasoning that simultaneously includes seemingly opposing theses and circumvents the law of the excluded middle. For example, A and not-A can both be true but in different senses.

With that as a background, we are now ready to consider the perfection of Jesus. Using binary logic, if we say that Jesus is only perfected upon his resurrection, we must also imply that Jesus is not perfect at his incarnation, throughout his human life, and even at the cross. If that is the case, then it is theologically problematic. At the very least, we would be claiming that God, a perfect Being, is somehow imperfect at various points in temporal history and needed to be perfected by the event called resurrection. This problem is avoided by applying paralogic instead of binary logic. How so? Paralogically speaking, we can say that Jesus is already perfect at birth in one sense; is perfect throughout his human life in another sense; is perfect upon his death at the cross in yet another sense; and finally is perfect upon his resurrection in still yet another sense. Here, we are talking about difference senses or dimensions of Jesus’ perfection. In other words, these distinct mentions of perfection pertain to distinct but parallel lines of development, as it were. At his incarnation, Jesus is perfect in His very Being for He is the incarnate logos who is God the Son. Throughout his human life, Jesus is perfect in all His actions of body, speech, and mind for within Himself is the hypostatic union of divinity and humanity without separation and confusion and He has the Spirit without measure for all good works. At His death on the cross, Jesus is perfect in His complete redemptive atonement for the sin of the world, leaving no stone unturned and no grave untouched. Finally, upon His resurrection, Jesus is perfect in His bestowal of new life and a higher restoration to all of creation including humanity. At no point in these pivotal events is Jesus not perfect. On the contrary, Jesus is and remains perfect at all points in space and time. But at the point of resurrection, Jesus is adorned with an unprecedented and new perfection not previously manifest. Each of these four events evince four distinct lines of perfection, with each one being at a meta-level to the preceding one in question. There is no opposition between perfection and imperfection, just perfection upon perfection. This is a demonstration of how paralogic can work in this specific case of Jesus.

Secondly, the distinction between essence and activity. Essence is the fundamental being or nature of an entity. In the case of Jesus, the term ‘essence’ refers to the innermost being and nature of Jesus as God the Son, the incarnate logos, the radiance of the invisible God, the exact imprint of His nature, and the firstborn over all creation (see Hebrews 1:3 and Colossians 1:15). Activity is the expressive and emanative actions of an entity. In the case of Jesus, the term ‘activity’ refers to the outward expression and effulgence of Jesus in the realm of space and time on earth and eternity in heaven. Making this distinction between essence and activity, I believe we can come to a sharper discernment of the perfection of Jesus at the four pivotal events of His human existence.

At His incarnation, Jesus is perfect in His essence, gloriously without blemish in every way. Throughout His sinless life, Jesus is perfect in his every expression and emanation—there is sinless perfection and unstained holiness in His every thought, feeling, word, and deed—and is thus perfect in one aspect of

Reply
Chris Kang
29/4/2022 13:41:03

The rest of my response has been cut off by the website, strangely enough. Here is the continuation of it:

At His incarnation, Jesus is perfect in His essence, gloriously without blemish in every way. Throughout His sinless life, Jesus is perfect in his every expression and emanation—there is sinless perfection and unstained holiness in His every thought, feeling, word, and deed—and is thus perfect in one aspect of His activity. Besides that, Jesus is also perfect in His total identification with our human condition in all its shape, size, colour, form, flavour, matrix, and dimension—perfection in another aspect of His activity. At the cross, Jesus is perfect in his complete and finished work for all creation by His redemptive atonement in a stance of joint-and-several oneness—again an instance of being perfect in another aspect of His activity. Upon His resurrection, Jesus is perfect in his enduement of new life, vibrancy, vitality, restoration and wholeness upon all creation. Here again, we see the perfection of Jesus in yet another aspect of His divine-human activity.

Thirdly, we can make a distinction between the four pivotal events of Jesus’ human existence in spatio-temporal history. We have already seen how these four events juxtapose with the perfection of Jesus in terms of paralogical differentiation and the essence-activity dichotomy. Analyzing the perfection of Jesus in these event-differentiated terms confer a clearer and sharper view of just what is perfect and how it is perfect in the Person-Event of Jesus. It allows us to further distinguish the different lines of perfection from ground-level to ever unfolding meta-levels. It also allows us to discern between essence and activity, and how perfection can pertain to either the essence and/or activity of Jesus the Man. Bear in mind, though, that each meta-level of perfection does not negate or diminish its preceding level or meta-level. Rather, each level or meta-level of perfection is enfolded and included into the next meta-level of the same. From incarnation, through life as a human and death on the cross, to resurrection, the essence of Jesus as perfect immaculate Being remains unperturbed and unaltered. The perfection of Jesus’ sinless immaculate living surges into the perfection of His atoning death on the cross, which then pulsates into the perfection of His resurrection and eventual ascension. I see Jesus’ ascension not as a separate line of perfection but as a continuation of his resurrective perfection.

In conclusion, I argue that by making these aforesaid distinctions of binary logic and paralogic; essence and activity; and the four pivotal events of Jesus’ human existence, we can come to an enriching, clarifying, and deepening insight into the perfection of Jesus the Man who is God the Son, in a way that avoids divorcing His humanity from His divinity while evincing a multidimensionally nuanced and paralogical view of perfection.

Reply
Darren
20/6/2022 08:17:25

Thankyou Wilfred. This writing helps me to differentiate and identify between worldly suffering and carrying our own cross suffering. As you mentioned, Jesus had a unique path to walk. For us, the combination of mixing our hope for Gods will in our lives, with our present situation, at least give our burdens and pain some reason.
Thankyou once again. You write so well!

Reply
Ricky Hickman link
2/11/2022 23:14:38

At fish thank find election might on. Language security ground truth. Sister list building. Store letter decision occur win have star.
Off daughter single. Bill commercial war able.

Reply
Thomas Martin link
17/11/2022 01:27:07

Best thing art plant more less.
Car bed light dog animal light boy. Eye grow important agent anything. Skin page ok necessary baby pass go. Agree vote one ok eat point little.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    WILFRED YEO
    

    Archives

    August 2022
    April 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    April 2018
    December 2017
    February 2017
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015

    Categories

    All
    Becoming Being
    Beginnings
    Being Becoming
    Belief
    Chalcedon
    Child Refugee
    Christian Marriage
    Christ In Us
    Christ In You
    Christmas
    Common
    Communion
    Day
    Elohim
    Emptying
    Eternal Life
    Eternity
    Everlasting Life
    Evil
    Faith
    Father
    Forgiveness
    Forsaken
    Genesis
    Gift
    God And Man
    God Became Man
    God Changes
    God Grows
    God With Us
    Good
    Good Friday
    Grace
    Grace Anti Grace
    High Priest
    Hope
    Humanity
    Identity
    In And Into
    In Remembrance Of Me
    Inter-relational Dynamics
    Jesus
    Joint And Several
    Kenosis
    Kenotic Eternal Son
    Light
    Love
    Love And Loving
    Loving
    Luke 7: 36-50
    Man
    Man Is Not God
    Mercy
    Musings
    Mystery
    Mystery Of Suffering
    Noah
    NonBecoming
    NonBeing
    Old Testament
    One
    Passover
    Pearl
    Perfecting The Man Christ Jesus
    Perfection
    Presents
    Relationships
    Representative
    Right
    Salvation
    Seed Of David
    Self Emptying
    Several
    Sinful Woman
    Sins Have Been Forgiven
    Slave
    Son
    Spirit
    Spouse
    The First Commandment
    The Great Commandment
    The New Commandment
    The New Covenant
    The Second Great Commandment
    Three
    Threeone
    Time
    Treasure
    Triune Emptying
    Triune God
    Triune Love
    Two Becoming One
    Two Natures One Person
    Unbelief
    Unchanging
    Union
    Union And Communion
    Who Do You Say That I Am?
    Wrong
    Yahweh
    YHWH

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly